EFSA's conflict of interest
Email Print
Dr. Joachim Schiemann has been forced out of his position on the GMO Panel of the European Food Safety Authority (EFSA), amid allegations of a "conflict of interest". He's been a long-standing target of European Greens and their activist cohorts, due to his broad engagement with those involved in researching and regulating GM crops. The last straw: his appointment as head of  the Institute for Biosafety of Genetically Modified Plants at the Julius Kühn Institute in Quedlinburg -- where activists recently destroyed 270 GM apple trees, and with them, a decade of research. The EFSA obviously has a conflict of interest--seeking scientific credibility, while rejecting scientific expertise to appease the unappeasable opponents of biotech.

It's impossible to do both, and everyone who has tried, has failed.

"I really regret the decision of the EFSA hierarchy", Dr. Schiemann said. "I would have liked to carry on working on the panel for another three years."

The EFSA has already been marginalized by European politicians and institutions. If the Authority keeps green appeasement on its agenda, it will find itself estranged from mainstream science, as well. Which means Dr. Schiemann is probably better off without the EFSA, than vice versa.

He'll have some serious work on his hands at the Julius Kühn Institute, such as establishing effective security for field trials. That's because, in Germany, it's illegal to guard field trials.

Share: